Does the Endorsment Mean Anything?
The Washington Post endorsed Creigh Deeds in yesterday's paper, yet they seem to still get their facts wrong. Can the Post endorsement even be taken serious with their endorsement history? Washington Post blogger Rosalind Helderman even recognizes that their endorsements in the past usually back the losers, "To be fair, our friends in editorial have a long history of backing the wrong horse in endorsements. (Kerry over Bush in 2004; Harris Miller over Jim Webb in the 2006 primary)."
For the real interpretation on the Post endorsement read Red NOVA-
http://rednova8.com/2009/10/18/washington-post-endorsement-vote-for-deeds-hell-raise-your-taxes/
For the real interpretation on the Post endorsement read Red NOVA-
http://rednova8.com/2009/10/18/washington-post-endorsement-vote-for-deeds-hell-raise-your-taxes/
No comments:
Post a Comment